Abu Ghraib Prison Abuses Reported By Whistleblower, Joseph Darby ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ January 13

Share
Independently produced. Individually supported. Donate.

Abu Ghraib Prison Abuses Reported By Whistleblower, Joseph Darby
by Davis Fleetwood

Are you obedient?

Good morning scholars. The answer you give to the question for today will most likely be a lie, but the year is long, and our experiment only beginning.

Before talking about Joseph Darby, the U.S. soldier at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison, who reported U.S. abuses of Iraqi prisoners to the Army’s Criminal Investigations Division immortalizing those horrific photos, we should consider the work of Stanley Milgram.

A Yale professor, now deceased, who is most famous for his study measuring the willingness of participants to perform acts as instructed by an authority figure when those acts went against their conscience. With a vanity commonly accepted in the scientific community, this landmark study was called the Milgram experiment.

You remember this from school, yes? Participants were told they were taking part in a study about learning. When a subject got a question wrong, a man in a white lab coat and brandishing a clipboard (played by an actor) would instruct the subject (who was told he was the “teacher” in this experiment on learning) to electrocute the “learner” (also played by an actor). 37 out of 40 “teachers”  (subjects of the experiment, obediently delivered what they believed to be electric shocks of up to 450 volts to their unseen (but often heard, screaming victim). Some subjects paused at 135 volts, but when assured that they would not be held responsible, they continued on.

They obeyed the authority figure. The man in the white lab coat.

Joseph Darby, a U.S. Army specialist punching a clock at a low risk prison- that is a prison in Iraq, that, according to the internal US ARMY investigation reports admittedly did not contain any terror suspects, asked a colleague for some photos of Iraq to email home. The college gave him a CD of photos, perhaps forgetting that on that CD, along with Iraq sunsets and tourist attractions, there existed photos depicting US servicemen and women torturing and sexually humiliating Iraqi prisoners.

If Darby were in the 37 out of 40, he would have done nothing. Everything he was trained for, and according to the Milgram study, everything in human nature itself was working against what Darby did next.

On this day in the USA, January 13, 2004 slipped the CD in an envelope with an anonymous note to the Army’s Criminal Investigations Division.

Soon thereafter, as the photos went public, Darby was having lunch in the mess hall, watching Donald Rumsfeld testify before Congress about Abu Ghraib, when Rumsfeld said:  “And we should mention that as well, 1st Specialist Joseph Darby, who alerted the appropriate authorities that abuses were occurring.”

Rumsfeld, living in a world where Milgram’s findings were the rule, was well aware that outing Darby equated putting Darby’s life in danger, and keep others from coming forward. In other words, Rumsfeld was just doing his job.

Anonymous no more, Darby’s family was moved into Federal protective housing, a prudent measure given the velocity and frequency of the death threats they were receiving.

Darby was given a JFK Profile in Courage award from Caroline and Ted Kennedy.

But they killed Kennedy.

Scholars, if today’s lesson proves anything, perhaps it is this:

Trying to change the world “one person at a time” is time wasted.

What we need to do is replace the man in the white lab coat.

I’m Davis Fleetwood reminding you that history is based on actual events.

ω

Find THIS DAY IN THE USA on YouTube, get the free video podcast delivered to your itunes
Join NO CURE FOR THAT on facebook

Nancy Kerrigan Assaulted ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ January 6

Share
Independently produced. Individually supported. Donate.

Good morning scholars. Rarely does life present such a simple dividing line. Your question for today is a simple one: Nancy Kerrigan or Tonya Harding?

Nancy Kerrigan Assaulted ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ January 6
by Davis Fleetwood

A hard scrabble, blue collar athlete, Tonya Harding Lacked the traditional angelic looks and white cap dentistry favored for decades by the judges who hold the fate of figure skaters in their hands. Tonya Harding was a freedom fighter. A poor kid from the Northwest, waging a revolution on the Barbie world of Olympic figure skating.

As history teaches us over and over, one person’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist. And that other man usually has more influence than you, if you get my drift.

And so it follows, that during a practice session for the 1994 U.S. figure skating championships in Detroit Tonya Harding’s main rival, Nancy Kerrigan was attacked: a single blow to the knee delivered – allegedly – by hit man Shane Stant. The date was January 6, 1994, and the question remains- was Stant acting alone?

It is widely accepted that Tonya Harding and her ex-husband, Jeff Gilooly, had hired Stant to carry out the attack. But as history receeds, mounting evidence is surfacing to bring new theories credibility.

First: Why would Tonya Harding, the first woman ever to do a triple axel in the short program,the first woman to do two triple axels in a single competition, and the first ever to do a triple axel combination (with double toe loop) need to resort to such Vince McMahnion tactics?

Second, detailed medical reports show that the injuries sustained by Nancy Kerrigan could only have been caused by multiple blows from different angles; not the single blow purported in court evidence against Harding.

Retired CIA officer Gerard Buchanon, has just come out with a new book: Harding, Kerrigan, and Other Domestic Secret Ops. In it, Buchanon claims it was the CIA, and not Harding, who hired and trained Stant for the Kerrigan mission. Additionally, two underover CIA operative were also on the scene with high powered and extremely accurate marble pistols, each striking Nancy Kerrigan’s knee with a 1 inch diameter marble at a speed of 300 mph at the exact same time as Stant delivered his blow. This theory is born out through Kerrigan’s x rays and other medical records.

Buchanon was on a secret team he called media management and mythmaking and on a mission he said to create an underdog hero the country could believe as an entertainment opiate for a finacial crisis the governement saw as imminent.

The crisis was averted, and Buchanon’s role shifted to ensuring that the case against Harding, both in the court of law and in the court of public opinion was airtight.

And Gerard Buchanon, in his role as CIA operative for the media manangement and mythmaking department, was very good at his job.

I’m Davis Fleetwood, reminding you that history is based on actual events.

ω

Find THIS DAY IN THE USA on YouTube, get the free video podcast delivered to your itunes
Join NO CURE FOR THAT on facebook

The Eisenhower Doctrine ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ Jan 5

Share
Independently produced. Individually supported. Donate.

The Eisenhower Doctrine ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ Jan 5
by Davis Fleetwood

Good morning scholars.

Questions for discussion today: How long has the United States been meddling in the Middle East? What is the difference between Pre-emptive and proactive? And what exactly are the limits the “fair use” doctrine of copyright law?

On this day in the USA, Jan 5 1957 the President implemented The Eisenhower doctrine. This was not the eloquent Dwight D Eisenhower many of us know from his most daring Presidential farewell address warning our dear ears about the military industrial complex, this was four years earlier, when Dwight D was addressing Congress. And he didn’t say preventive or pre-emptive, okay? He said proactive. Perhaps a westerner experiencing the proxy violence implanted under these various doctrines through the sterilized opinion pages of The New York Times could split those rhetorical hairs for us, but I’m not so sure a resident of Lebanon or the Gaza strip or Iraq or Pakistan could.

Here is how Dwight explained it: To meet the “increased danger from International Communism” new U.S. sponsored programs of economic and military cooperation that would “secure and protect the territorial integrity and political independence of friendly nations.” Soon thereafter, some 15 thousand U.S. troops were sent into Lebanon, and we have been there, in one form or another, ever since. Just to help. We are here to help. Be not afraid, says Uncle Sam, (sing it with me now:) We come before you always. Come follow me, and I will give you rest.

Truth is, we must have been meddling in the Middle East even longer than that, no?

Certainly the first coordinated covert action against the Middle East took place long before the United States was even born. I’m talking, of course about Western born artists “ “ the image of Jesus Christ and depicting him as a white man. A footnote: Sheppard Fairy, following a tradition established by such art world luminaries like Andy Warhol and Bob Rauschenberg, the artist Sheppard Fairy “ repurposed“ an AP photo of Barack Obama to create the posterized image of candidate Obama with the single word HOPE. This work of transformed an election and was thought to be protected under fair use copyright law. If so, changing the skin tone on the cadaver hanging from the cross to strike fear and guilt into a white race, is also protected, no?

A footnote to the footnote: Sheppard Fairy, sued by the AP for the use of the Obama photograph, lost in federal court. What are the implications for artistic rendering of a white Jesus? Discuss and get back to me.

And we’re back: As the United States of America come into power, defending the Holocaust they inflicted in the name of “manifest destiny” only to have history reward them, who could blame them for extending their reach? The Eisenhower doctrine was but the next logical step.

The U.S., self defined as both a Christian nation and as a Capitalist one (and while it is redundant to note the predatory nature of capitalism, this fact is oft buried and seems pertinent here) has an interest in the Middle East because of its connection to the book of revelations and the book of trickle down economics.

I’m Davis Fleetwood reminding you that history is based on actual events.

ω

Share
Find THIS DAY IN THE USA on YouTube, get the free video podcast delivered to your itunes

Join NO CURE FOR THAT on facebook

Davis Fleetwood on facebook, twitter, myspace

What’s so funny about peace, love and Marxism? ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ Jan 3

Share
Independently produced. Individually supported. Donate.

What’s so funny about peace, love and Marxism? ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ Jan 3
by Davis Fleetwood
Good morning scholars. Discussion topics for the day include: Who killed Kennedy and why? And what’s so funny about peace, love and Marxism?

The CIA failed in their efforts to assassinate Castro. They recruited the mob. The mob failed in killing Castro.

So, while the CIA was busy training counterrevolutionaries (including, but not limited to a puppet government that had installed in Guatemala) that would rid the world of the evil communist threat that resided in Cuba, it was on January 3, 1961 that one of the only overt actions executed by the U.S. Government against the Castro regime took place. The Dwight Eisenhower administration, with only two weeks left before the inauguration of a man won the election by promising to rid the world of the evils of Communism – John F Kennedy- terminated diplomatic relations with Cuba.

Some say Kennedy won because he was prettier than his opponent, Eisenhower VP Tricky Dick Nixon. With more and more consumers in the capitalist aspiring hegemony of the 1960s United States owning television sets, Nixon didn’t stand a chance against a player like Kennedy. Others credit those same mob connections that failed to kill Castro with rigging the election in Kennedy’s favor. Yet no true scholar denies that it was some potent combination of the Mob, the CIA and Cuba that blew the pretty face of JFK out the back of his skull and onto the trunk the infamous 1961 Lincoln Continental Convertible on a sunny fall afternoon in Dallas.

Political assassinations were so “in” in the sixties, you dig? Kennedy had pissed off so many groups with the ability to kill him that applying the “motive, means, and opportunity” criteria hardly narrows the field of suspects.

But JFK’s death is a topic for another day.
In cutting off diplomatic ties with Cuba and waging an anti communist propaganda campaign; the U.S. government successfully transformed the reputation of Cuba revolutionary figures. You see, in the early 60s, the majority of the U.S. population was still in love with the Cuban revolutionaries and their heroic struggle. Castro and Che Guevara were seen as romantic freedom fighters, beating unthinkable odds to establish freedom. They were the socio- political precursors to Rocky Balboa. But not so in the living rooms of the U.S., newly retrofitted with those plum benefits of capitalism: the Television set. General Electric, manufactures of machines that killed in a wide variety of ways, had given every God fearing Wally, Beaver Daddy knows best home the means to deliver the U.S. government’s propaganda campaign that turned U.S. workers’ opinions concerning Cuba on their head.

One would think, after 50 years in which the world has only gotten more dangerous, and the rich have only gotten richer, the poor poorer, the middle class ever shrinking that it might be time again to ask the question:

What’s so funny about peace love and Marxism?

I’m Davis Fleetwood, reminding you that history is based on actual events.

ω

Share
Find THIS DAY IN THE USA on YouTube, get the free video podcast delivered to your itunes

Join NO CURE FOR THAT on facebook

Davis Fleetwood on facebook, twitter, myspace

Jimmy Carter’s Cold War Whoop Ass Can ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ Jan 2

Share
Find THIS DAY IN THE USA on YouTube, Davis Fleetwood onFacebook Independently produced. Individually supported. Donate.

Jimmy Carter’s Cold War Whoop Ass Can ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ Jan 2
by Davis Fleetwood

Questions for discussion:
What will Madison Avenue call the Second Cold War? When will history book say it began? What is so funny about peace, love and Marxism? When do we begin the “duck and cover” drills again? What the hell is a d’tente, and should Carter have ended it?

Deep in the first Cold War, by December 1979, to counter a covert propaganda battle being fought by the CIA against the Marxist controlled Afghanistan; the Soviets came to the aid of the communist Afghan government, then under siege by anti-communist rebels who also happened to be religious lunatics of the Muslim variety. If you are among the 1 out of 5 students who pay attention to the lies taught to you in the typical high school U.S. History classroom, the Soviets were propping up a puppet government in Afghanistan.

This is what victory in the first Cold War would mean: the ability to prop up a puppet government in places like Afghanistan without some Vodka swilling Fukhov breathing down your neck.

So on January 2^nd, 1980- an election year, by the way, President Carter busted out his version of whoop ass. He requested that the Senate postpone action on the SALT-II nuclear weapons treaty and recalled the U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union. He even hinted that the U.S. might boycott the summer Olympics, scheduled for Moscow later that year. Pretty badass for a cardigan wearing energy conservationist who couldn’t get Iran to give back a few hostages.

So what happened? Well, the ones fighting the commies in Afghanistan were the Islamist Mujahideen Resistance. Some branding genius on Madison Avenue came up with the moniker “freedom fighters”. The US got in bed, covertly, with the Saudis to support these Freedom Fighters. Fast forward a decade or so, and down comes the mighty Soviet Union.

The Cold War was over. The U.S. had won, which meant we could alter the affairs of lesser nations without the meddlesome check and balance of a peer nation with conflicting socio-economic worldviews. Communism was dead. Long live Capitalism.

So Uncle Sam was paying, training and arming yesterday’s freedom fighters, which are not so attached to a country, as they are a religion. I wonder how that worked out?

Now it is America propping up a puppet government in Afghanistan- a tribal culture that is in fact not even a country- in order to secure a major oil pipeline and ostensibly to chase down Osama and his crew in neighboring Pakistan.

Thank God (and you know what God I mean, not the towel head variety) that we have China to thank for her emergence on the worlds stage laying claim as the worlds largest economy. China’s military is nothing to sneeze at either. And we owe them so much money!!!!

So the Second Cold War, the one yet to come, will surely be a balm for our stagnating economy a boost for our national identity, one final chance to shove capitalism and freedom down the unappreciative throat of the world. The only things left to decide are, what do we call it, and whose side are you on? The book of Revelation vs. The book of Zen? Accurate, perhaps, but something lacking.

CWII?

Revenge of the Dragon?

I’m Davis Fleetwood, reminding you that history is based on actual events.

ω

Share
Find THIS DAY IN THE USA on YouTube, Davis Fleetwood onFacebook Independently produced. Individually supported. Donate.

Emancipation Proclamation ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ January 1

Share
Find THIS DAY IN THE USA on YouTube, Davis Fleetwood onFacebook Independently produced. Individually supported. Donate.

Emancipation Proclamation ♦ This Day In The USA ♦ January 1
by Davis Fleetwood
(scroll down for poll)

On this day in the USA, 1994, NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, went into affect. The intended effect of NAFTA on capitalism is not unlike like the effect steroids on a bodybuilder: Temporarily pretty on the outside, while you testes atrophy shrink to the size of a garbanzo bean. Metaphor loosely translated: NAFTA  increases the share of the pie that go to the richest 1% of in the world, and the rest of us get yellowish, tasteless legumes.

On January 1^st, 1892, Ellis Island opened and over the course of the next six decades welcomed some 12 million immigrants who made their way over from Europe on crammed, disease-infected ships. Irish, Italians, and a 127 Chinese heard the siren song of Lady Liberty to:

“Give me your tired, your poor, 
 Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, we are fast loosing ground in the Industrial Revolution, now that we have abolished slavery.”

So if you were male, and you could pass a physical, you got yourself a room on the lower east side and just like that, you were an American Citizen. Females, the elderly, and people with headache, stomach upset or erections lasting longer than six hours were sent packing back to the old country. The Irish and the Italians built bridges and railroads and skyscrapers, while the 127 Chinese went on to head up math and Science departments an top Universities all over the country to teach the silver spoon leeches some physics and before you can click your heels together and say “Manhattan Project” you have got yourself a handy dandy micro history of the 20^th century. A century that saw the USA win the race of world military dominance, riding the crazy train of a Conscienceless Capitalism out of control combined with a religious outlook that has not gotten a new operating system since the middle ages that is now hurtling exponentially closer to a self fulfilling prophecy of Armageddon. And before you knew what was happening, the privileged class had circumvented the abolishment of slavery, and learned to get on getting on in a post civil war America with slavery 2.0: Cheap labor shoved into slums breaking their backs to preserve the “top-hat-white-glove” crowd justifying the pornographic hoarding of wealth with some Ayn Randian philosophy.

Do you think this is what Abe Lincoln had in mind when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which took effect on January 1^st, 1863? Of course not- Lincoln cared little about the cause of slavery- he was just trying to win the civil war by denying the Confederates free labor. Were slaves in Union States freed in 1863 by this famous proclamation?

Nigga please!

That would have alienated the privileged class of the North. Do you think it is the American way to put a man’s face on the $5 bill for loosing a war?

I’m Davis Fleetwood, reminding you that history is based on actual events.